THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RICHARD E. BERRY, SUSAN F. HENSHAW
and DAVID J. ROBERTS
__________
Appeal No. 96-1396
Application 08/176,3351
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and CARMICHAEL, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-15, which constitute
Application for patent filed January 3, 1994.1
According to the appellants, the application is a continuation
of Application 07/888,221, filed May 26, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007