Appeal No. 96-1396 Application 08/176,335 new rejection of independent claims 1, 6 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by the disclosure of Fleming. For purposes of reading the claimed invention on the disclosure of Fleming, we will use claim 1 as the representative claim. We also interpret claim 1 in its broadest form which means that we interpret "one or more icons" as meaning one icon and "one or more actionable objects" as meaning one actionable object. Claim 1 reads on Fleming as follows: (a) means for producing a menu bar in a window is met by menu bar 37 of Fleming; (b) means for placing a menu bar icon in the menu bar is met by icon 45 of Fleming; (c) means for associating one...actionable object in said window with said menu bar icon ... and being operable independent of said menu bar icon is met by actionable object "project X" of Fleming and by menu bar icon 45 of Fleming; [note that actionable object "Project X" is operable independent of menu bar icon 45 by use of icon 21]; (d) means for sending a selection message to the one...associated actionable object in response to operator selection of the menu bar icon is met by icon 45 of Fleming; [note that selection of icon 45 causes a selection message to be sent to actionable object "Project X"]. Since the broadest reasonable interpretation of 10Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007