Appeal No. 96-1435
Application 08/265,497
that Sklarew and Crane accomplish this result [answer, pages
15-17]. Again, it is our view that the examiner has
misconstrued the applied prior art, and we agree with the
arguments presented by appellant. Therefore, we do not
sustain the rejection of claims 29-34.
In summary, we have not sustained the examiner’s
rejection of any of the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Therefore, the decision of the examiner rejecting claims 1-10,
13-25 and 29-34 is reversed.
REVERSED
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007