Appeal No. 96-1603 Application 08/057,989 looking at Figure 2 that bearing 15 is a hydrostatic bearing. The examiner responds: Appellant would have the Board believe that the spaces around elements 15, 16, 17 in his figure 2 are indicative of ports and grooves for a hydrostatic bearing. The examiner is of the opinion that the spaces in figure 2 are similar to the spaces around elements 10, 12, 13, 14 in appellant’s figure 1 which merely represent spaces between parts. Even if one concluded that the spaces in figure 2 were ports and grooves, they would further conclude that these ports and grooves were lubrication structures for grease and not for hydrostatic bearings since no additional structure is present to provide fluid for a hydrostatic arrangement, i.e., no sump, pump or connecting lines are present. [Examiner Answer at page 6] We agree with the analysis of the examiner. Appellant argues that those of ordinary skill in the art would know by looking at Figure 2, that bearing 15 is a hydrostatic bearing. Filed along with the reply brief, is a document of unknown origin, entitled “Outline of Mechanical Structure” which depicts hydrostatic pressure pockets on a worktable. We initially note that the exhibit was not accompanied by a 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007