THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
This opinion (1) was not written for publication and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YOSHIMI KAMIMOTO, TAIJI YAMAMOTO,
RYUJI HOSAKA, TOSHITAKA NAKAGAWA, and YUTAKA UEHARA
____________
Appeal No. 96-1624
Application 07/913,6151
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, FLEMING, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
BACKGROUND
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 2-7 and 12. (Paper 17 at 1.) No other
claims are pending. (Paper 12 at 1.)
The examiner rejected claims 2-7 and 12 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 over the following reference:
Ohkubo 5,123,063 16 June 1992
(filed Oct. 10, 1990)
We reverse.
1 Attorney docket no. 03327.1540, filed July 18, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007