Ex parte KAMIMOTO et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 96-1624                                         Page 4           
          Application 07/913,615                                                      
               By contrast, the keyboard 24 and RAM 23 that Ohkubo                    
          discloses are associated with the image processor 20, not the               
          scanners 13-1 through 13-N.  (4:16-20; Fig. 1.)  Indeed, in                 
          Ohkubo, control flows exclusively from the image processor out to           
          the scanners (2:22-30), not vice versa.  Although Ohkubo                    
          discusses "code transmitted from the scanner" (3:40-60), it                 
          appears in context that "code" is simply image data in the format           
          used by a particular scanner.                                               
               Since Ohkubo does not teach or suggest a limitation in                 
          claim 12, we must reverse the rejection of claim 12 as                      
          unpatentable over Ohkubo.  The rejections of the remaining                  
          claims, which depend from claim 12, must likewise be reversed.              

























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007