THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte HERBERT SCHONMEIER, PETER HOFFMANN,
HARTMUT DROPCZYNSKI and REINHARD SCHONEN
________________
Appeal No. 96-1678
Application 08/322,7311
________________
HEARD: FEBRUARY 4, 1998
________________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, COHEN and
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of
claims 19, 21 and 26. Claims 20, 22-25 and 27-32, the only other
claims remaining in the application, stand withdrawn from
1Application for patent filed October 13, 1994. According
to appellants the application is a continuation of Application
07/849,022, filed April 21, 1992, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007