THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ALAN R. PFAFF
__________
Appeal No. 96-1687
Application No. 08/192,0671
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, ABRAMS and
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally
rejecting claims 1-24, which constitute all of the claims of
record in the application.
1Application for patent filed February 3, 1994. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation of Application
08/002,660, filed January 11, 1993, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007