Ex parte PFAFF - Page 2




                Appeal No. 96-1687                                                                                                            
                Application No. 08/192,067                                                                                                    


                         The appellant's invention is directed to a rotary die                                                                
                machine of the type used to cut blanks from a thin web of                                                                     
                material passing through the nip of the dies.  The subject matter                                                             
                before us on appeal is illustrated by reference to claim 1, which                                                             
                is reproduced in an appendix to the APPLICANT’S NEW BRIEF.                                                                    


                                                           THE REFERENCES                                                                     
                         The references relied upon by the examiner to support the                                                            
                final rejection are:                                                                                                          
                Bell et al. (Bell)                                4,759,247                         Jul. 26, 1988                             
                Fokos et al. (Fokos)                              5,001,950                         Mar. 26, 1991                             
                Kakko-Chiloff                                     5,058,472                         Oct. 22, 1991                             
                Swiss patent (Swiss ‘931)                         326,931                           Jan. 15, 19582                            
                European patent (EP ‘559)                         234,559                           Feb. 25, 19872                            

                                                           THE REJECTIONS                                                                     
                         Claims 1-6 and 17-19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                                         
                being unpatentable over Kakko-Chiloff in view of EP ‘559 and                                                                  
                Bell.                                                                                                                         
                         Claims 7-9 and 21-23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                                                         
                being unpatentable over Kakko-Chiloff in view of EP ‘559, Bell                                                                
                and Swiss ‘931.                                                                                                               


                         2Translations enclosed.                                                                                              
                                                                      2                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007