Appeal No. 96-1709
Application 08/149,361
crystal displays, and a hold operation to inhibit the write
operation and instead to cause said first and second liquid
crystal displays to hold a previous signal of a previous
field; and
distributing means for receiving said timing signal
from said controlling means and for distributing said timing
control signal between the pair of said first and second
liquid crystal displays.
The examiner relies on the following references:
Suntola 4,907,862 Mar. 13, 1990
Fujisawa et al. (Fujisawa) 4,926,166 May 15, 1990
Sakariassen 5,032,912 July 16, 1991
Shirochi 5,155,477 Oct. 13, 1992
Nakayoshi et al. (Nakayoshi) 5,357,277 Oct. 18, 1994
(filed Sep. 28,
1992)
Claims 1-3, 5, 6, 10-13, 15 and 17-19 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the
collective teachings of Shirochi, Fujisawa and Sakariassen, or
the collective teachings of Shirochi, Fujisawa and Nakayoshi.
Claim 14 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 on either
combination of teachings cited above, in further view of
Suntola.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007