Appeal No. 96-1904 Application 08/164,854 (Germany) (Leipzig)2 3 IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, “KEYBOARD FOR HANDHELD COMPUTER,” Vol. 27, No. 10A, pages 5643 through 5645, March, 1985 (IBM reference) The following rejections are before us for review. Claims 1 and 3 through 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, for the reason that the specification, as originally filed, does not provide support for the recitation that the keyboard may be operated “independently of supporting surfaces” (claim 1). Claims 20 and 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as being broad to the extent that they 2Our understanding of this document is derived from a reading of a translation thereof prepared in the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the translation was appended to the examiner’s answer (Paper No. 14). 3We will refer to this reference as the Leipzig document for consistency with the usage by both the examiner and appellant. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007