Appeal No. 96-2127
Application 08/158,054
cleaving operations as well as the rebirthing teachings within
Christensen itself.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the examiner
rejecting claims 1, 3 to 5 and 7 under 35 U.S.C. § 102, as well
as the decision to reject claims 2 and 8 to 11 under 35 U.S.C. §
103 are both sustained. As such, the decision of the examiner
rejecting claims 1 to 5 and 7 to 11 on the basis of prior art
within 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103, is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007