Ex parte SIMON et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 96-2191                                                          
          Application 08/395,512                                                      


          containers of the Levendusky patents based upon the turntable               
          teaching of Pomeroy.                                                        

               The Levendusky food containers and the Pomeroy turntable               
          are clearly functionally and structurally distinctly different              
          entities, as disclosed, notwithstanding their common                        
          utilization in a microwave oven environment.  As earlier                    
          discussed, Levendusky would have directed those skilled in the              
          art to coat both the interior and exterior of a metal                       
          container for heating an object exposed to microwave radiation              
          in the interior of the container.  From our perspective, the                
          turntable teaching of Pomeroy would have advised an artisan to              
          coat a metal housing only externally when the metal interior                
          is not intended to be exposed to microwave radiation.                       
          Accordingly, it is our conclusion that the applied prior art                
          would not have suggested the absence of electrical insulator                
          means on the interior of an apparatus for heating an object                 
          therein by microwave radiation,                                             




          which radiation acts interiorly of the apparatus.  Lacking                  

                                          7                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007