Appeal No. 96-2275
Application 08/010,063
that there is at least one identifiable access window associated
with at least one function by some name where the access window
has at least two portions or regions therein which broadly relate
information in the hierarchy of displaying initially headings
that correspond to a set of operations and then phrases that
correspond to a particular set of operations in the manner
claimed.
The recited presentation window at the end of claims 1 and
29 on appeal is not recited in these claims to be a part of the
same access window, but clearly based on the disclosure the
presentation window is a separate successively presented window
to the user. For example, the showings at screen pages 17 to 19
indicate a sequential showing of first two indicia categories
displayed in two regions of the screen in representative screen
page 18 with a subsequent excitation of the “help index” depicted
at the bottom of screen page 18 displayed in detail, one selected
by the user, in a separately identified “presentation screen” at
succeeding screen page 19. Other “go to” categories exist as
depicted at screen page 18. It is clear that the examiner is
correct that such succeeding presentation page, when activated by
the users’ selection at the bottom of screen page 18, would
indicate to the user an instruction as to how to do certain
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007