Ex parte PALMER et al. - Page 10




          Appeal No. 96-2275                                                          
          Application 08/010,063                                                      


          most generic or comprehensive form showing the three access                 
          functions 135, 138 and 140.                                                 
               Inasmuch as this decision is consistent with appellants’               
          grouping of the claims and arguments and the fact that the                  
          examiner has separately reasoned the rejection for each and every           
          claim on appeal, we respectively sustain the rejection of                   
          respective claims 1 to 15, 17, 19, 29 to 43, 45, 47 and 59 under            
          35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103.  However, we have not sustained the               
          rejection of claim 60 under 35 U.S.C. § 102.                                
               Accordingly, the decision of the examiner is affirmed-in-              
          part.                                                                       












               No time period for taking any subsequent action in                     
          connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR                    
          § 1.136(a).                                                                 
                                  AFFIRMED-IN-PART                                    

                                          10                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007