Appeal No. 96-2455
Application 08/223,323
Gemy 1,062,196 Apr. 20,
1951
(French)
Schenz 3,419,728 Nov. 11,
1985
(German)
Horn 3,500,928 July 17,
1986
(German)2
Claims 1 through 7, 9 through 12, 18 through 21 and
24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Schenz in view of Nail and Gemy.
Claim 8 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Schenz in view of Nail and Gemy as
applied above, and further in view of Horn.
Reference is made to the examiner's answer (Paper
No. 25, mailed December 13, 1995) for the examiner's full
reasoning in support of the above-noted rejections. A com-
plete exposition of appellants' arguments thereagainst are
2A copy of a translation of each of the above-noted
foreign documents prepared by or for the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office is attached to this decision.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007