Appeal No. 96-2455
Application 08/223,323
and Horn, even if one of ordinary skill in the art were to
combine the teachings of Horn with those of the references
applied above, the deficiencies in the teachings of Schenz,
Nail and Gemy, as noted above would not be overcome.
Accordingly, the examiner's rejection of dependent claim 8
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 will also not be sustained.
As is apparent from the foregoing, the decision of
the examiner rejecting claims 1 through 12, 18 through 21 and
24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
HARRISON E. McCANDLISH )
Senior Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF
PATENT
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT ) APPEALS
AND
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007