Ex parte MEHTA et al. - Page 2




                Appeal No. 96-2457                                                                                                            
                Application 08/171,149                                                                                                        





                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                    
                                 This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                                       
                rejection of claims 1 through 9 and 11 through 16, which are all                                                              
                of the claims remaining in this application.  Claim 10 has been                                                               
                canceled.2                                                                                                                    


                                 Appellants' invention relates to a centrifugal fan                                                           
                having a slidably adjustable cutoff faring (32) located at, and                                                               
                selectively positionable within, the exit port of the fan housing                                                             
                for varying the area of the exit port such that the efficiency of                                                             
                the centrifugal fan can be varied to match the output efficiency                                                              
                of the fan to the desired air mass flow through an associated air                                                             
                delivery system.  The invention also addresses a method of opti-                                                              
                mizing the performance characteristics of a specific centrifugal                                                              
                fan for various air mass flow rates.  Claims 1, 8 and 14 are                                                                  
                representative of the subject matter on appeal and a copy of                                                                  
                these claims may be found in the Appendix to appellants' brief.                                                               



                         2Claim 15 was amended subsequent to the final rejection in                                                           
                a paper filed March 13, 1995 (Paper No. 6).                                                                                   
                                                                      2                                                                       





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007