Appeal No. 96-2457
Application 08/171,149
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejections of the appealed claims are:
Murphy 2,951,630 Sept. 6, 1960
Wood 3,191,851 June 29, 1965
Kang 5,092,136 Mar. 3, 1992
Claims 1, 2, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14 and 16 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Murphy in view
of Kang.
Claims 3 through 7, 13 and 15 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Murphy in view of Kang
as applied above, and further in view of Wood.
Rather than reiterate the examiner's full explanation
of the above-noted rejections and the conflicting viewpoints
advanced by the examiner and appellants regarding those
rejections, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper No.
11, mailed August 29, 1995) for the examiner's reasoning in
support of the rejections, and to appellants' brief (Paper No.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007