Appeal No. 96-2528
Application 08/011,202
rejection essentially for some reasons set forth by the
examiner at pages 3-5 and 8 and 9 of the answer.
It is to be noted that to comply with the requirements of
the cited paragraph, a claim must set out and circumscribe a
particular area with a reasonable degree of precision and
particularity when read in light of the disclosure and the
teachings of the prior art as it would be by the artisan.
Note In re Johnson, 558 F.2d 1008, 1016, 194 USPQ 187, 194
(CCPA 1977); In re Moore, 439 F.2d 1232, 1235, 169 USPQ 236,
238 (CCPA 1971).
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007