THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JEFFREY L. HILL, GREGORY S. HILL and ROBERT J. BRETL
_____________
Appeal No. 96-2712
Application 08/313,548 1
______________
HEARD: June 8, 1998
_______________
Before COHEN, MEISTER and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 3 through 5, 9 through 12, 19 and 20.
Application for patent filed September 23, 1994. According to1
appellants, this application is a continuation of application 08/036,436,
filed March 24, 1993, which is a continuation-in-part of application
08/019,865, filed February 19, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007