THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte CHAO-PENG CHEN and TILAK V. BOMMARAJU
____________
Appeal No. 96-2797
Application No. 08/432,4741
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 1 through 5, 7, 8, 10, 16 through
18, 20, 21, and 23. Claim 6, 11 through 13, 15, and 22 have
been withdrawn from further consideration as directed to a
non-elected embodiment.
1Application for patent filed May 1, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007