Appeal No. 96-2985
Application No. 08/332,620
Turning lastly to claims 5 through 7, Thomas discloses
perforations 24 in the tungsten foil 20, but, like Hasker,
does not disclose the two different layers of claim 10. The
35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of claims 5 through 7 is reversed
because Thomas does not cure the noted shortcoming in the
teachings of Watanabe.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007