Appeal No. 96-2990
Application 08/109,046
Claims 1 to 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. In
a first rejection, the examiner relies upon Zibrik in view of
Lidz and in the second rejection, Olson in view of Maroun.
Rather than repeat the positions of the appellant and the
examiner, reference is made to the Brief and the Answer for
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
Generally for the reasons presented by appellant in the
Brief, we reverse each of the respective rejections of the
claims on appeal.
As to the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102, we note that
Zibrik does not teach the claimed GPS receiver engine, nor
does it teach the claimed GPS antenna. As such, Zibrik fails
to meet the other limitations of independent claim 1 on appeal
relating to a housing enclosing the GPS receiver engine and
the GPS antenna electrically connected to that receiver engine
and being mountable in the housing in a particular movable
arrangement.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007