THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CLIFTON D. FINNEY
__________
Appeal No. 96-3062
Application 08/239,0291
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner finally
rejecting claims 21 through 23 and 34 through 38. At that point,
claims 1 through 20 had been canceled, claims 27 through 33
1Application for patent filed May 6, 1994. According to
appellant, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 08/219,192 filed March 28, 1994, now U.S. Patent No.
5,464,320 issued November 7, 1995, which is a continuation-in-
part of Application 08/074,023 filed June 2, 1993, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007