Ex parte JARDINE et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 96-3124                                                          
          Application 08/265,585                                                      


          message is faulty and discards all messages received from that              
          computer if determined to be faulty.  As disclosed in column                
          12, lines 45-50, the error message includes an error type                   
          code.  However, this code only identifies which of the fault                
          detection checks found in column 10, lines 29-46, determined a              
          fault.                                                                      
               Even if we could view the fault detection check, number                
          4, as a power failure determination and that the fault handler              
          204 broadcasted a power failure message, we fail to find that               
          Whiteside teaches checking the recordation of the received                  
          power failure message and if the recordation is found sending               
          a cautious message as recited in claim 3 or a regroup message               
          as recited in claim 6 indicating receipt of a power-fail                    
          message.  In contrast, upon receipt of the error message,                   
          Whiteside teaches that each computer decides on whether to                  
          discard the messages from the faulty computer.  Whiteside does              
          not teach method steps of checking for a recordation of a                   
          message and then sending a message if a recordation is found.               






                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007