THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte JUKKA HEINO,
RAIMO KOHONEN and ERKKI SAVOLAINEN
______________
Appeal No. 96-3181
Application 08/251,9631
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WARREN, ELLIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on Appeal and Opinion
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner rejecting for the
third time claims 1 through 21 as filed in this application. The examiner has now withdrawn all of the
1 Application for reissue patent, filed June 1, 1994. According to appellants, this application is reissue
of Patent No. 5,264,138, issued November 23, 1993, maturing from application 07/663,877, filed
May 1, 1991.
- 1 -
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007