Ex parte OLSEN - Page 9




          Appeal No. 96-3225                                                          
          Application 08/229,322                                                      


               The same rationale applies to the rejection of claim 24,               
          in which Belisle was added as evidence of the obviousness of                
          utilizing polyurethane as a transparent resin, and therefore                
          we will not sustain this rejection, either.                                 


                                       SUMMARY                                        
               None of the rejections are sustained.                                  

























                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007