Appeal No. 96-3404 Application 08/145,775 points downward in metal forms which can be packed continuously together . . .” (page 2, column 2, lines 62 and 63). Martin teaches the making of concrete posts and suggests that as “an environmental benefit” the concrete may also include filler of “recyclable rubber, e.g. from discarded tires chipped to a size of 0.5 inch and smaller” (see column 1, lines 59 and 60). Viner in column 1, lines 16-22, clearly teaches that “unused” or “waste” concrete may be used to “make concrete products.” In our view, one of ordinary skill in this art would have found it obvious to utilize tire chips in the method of Harza as taught by Martin in order to achieve Martin’s expressly stated advantage of providing an environmental benefit by using recyclable rubber. As to the particular percentage of tire chips and “spent” concrete, the selection of an optimum value for such a variable is ordinarily an obvious matter which is within the skill of the art. See In re Boesch, 617 F.2d 272, 276, 205 USPQ 215, 219 (CCPA 1980). Note also In re Woodruff, 919 F.2d 1575, 1578, 16 USPQ2d 1934, 1936-37 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Although the examiner has additionally relied on the teachings of 20Page: Previous 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007