Ex Parte ASTERLIN et al - Page 7



          Appeal No. 96-3465                                                         
          Application No. 07/848,856                                                 

                                      Claim 3                                        
               Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                    
          unpatentable over Colombo in view of Young or Tumminia.  We                
          reverse this rejection.                                                    
               Claim 3 recites a method for sealing an open end of                   
          cylindrically formed material comprising (1) inserting a heating           
          element having a plurality of heating parts into the open end;             
          (2) expanding the heating parts into contact with an interior              
          surface of the cylindrically formed material to cause the                  
          material at its open end to form overlapping material layers;              
          (3) pressing the overlapping layers onto the heating element to            
          melt the interior surface of the material; (4) collapsing the              
          heating parts and removing the heating element from the open end;          
          and (5) pressing the overlapping layers together at the melted             
          interior surface to seal the layers to each other.                         
               According to the examiner (Answer, p. 6):                             
               [I]nserting particular types of heating elements which                
               expands [sic, expand]/collapse on demand is directed to               
               specifics of apparatus limitation as opposed to process               
               limitations.  Indeed, the manipulative step of                        










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007