Ex parte ALDRIDGE - Page 1




                                            THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                               
                                The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                                                                                   
                                today (1) was not written for publication in a law                                                                                                     
                                journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                 
                                                                                                Paper No. 16                                                                           

                                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                               
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                               
                                                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                             
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                                Ex parte PAUL K. ALDRIDGE                                                                                              
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                                        Appeal No. 96-3615                                                                                             
                                                                   Application 08/237,5671                                                                                             
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                                                  ON BRIEF                                                                                             
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                     Before ABRAMS, STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent                                                                                                           
                     Judges.                                                                                                                                                           
                     STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                               


                                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                             
                                This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final                                                                                              
                     rejection of claims 4-8, 13-15, 17 and 23-30, and from the                                                                                                        
                     examiner’s refusal to allow claim 31 added by an amendment                                                                                                        


                                1 Application for patent filed May 3, 1994.                                                                                                            
                                                                                         -1-                                                                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007