Ex parte ALDRIDGE - Page 2




                     Appeal No. 96-3615                                                                                                                                                
                     Application 08/237,567                                                                                                                                            


                     filed subsequent to the final rejection.   Claims 1-3, 9-12,                          2                                                                           
                     16 and 18-22 have been canceled.  No other claims are                                                                                                             
                     currently pending.                                                                                                                                                
                                Appellant’s invention pertains to an apparatus and method                                                                                              
                     for mixing compositions of matter and detecting the                                                                                                               
                     homogeneity thereof “on-line.”   Independent claims 31 and 25,   3                                                                                                
                     copies of which appear in the appendix to appellant’s brief,                                                                                                      
                     are representative of the claimed apparatus and method,                                                                                                           
                     respectively.                                                                                                                                                     
                                The references of record relied upon by the examiner in                                                                                                
                     support of rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and 35 U.S.C.                                                                                                      
                     § 103 are:                                                                                                                                                        
                     Fischer                                                          2,514,126                                  Jul. 4, 1950                                          
                     Westhof et al. (Westhof)                            4            3,337,403                                  May  2, 1985                                          


                                2In the final rejection (Paper No. 8, mailed May 17,                                                                                                   
                     1995), the examiner inadvertently included claim 12 as a                                                                                                          
                     rejected claim despite claim 12 having been canceled by a                                                                                                         
                     prior amendment (Paper No. 7, submitted February 6, 1995).                                                                                                        
                                3“The term on-line means that the blender does not have                                                                                                
                     to be turned off in order to take the measurements to                                                                                                             
                     determine homogeneity and potency.”  Specification, page 2.                                                                                                       
                                4Our understanding of this German language document is                                                                                                 
                     derived from a translation prepared on behalf of the Patent                                                                                                       
                     and Trademark Office.  A copy of said translation is attached                                                                                                     
                                                                                         -2-                                                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007