THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte KIM C. BERTIN, ROBERT BOOTH JR., DENNIS W. BURKE,
RODNEY BAYS, TERRY L. DIETZ, GREGORY C. STALCUP
and RICHARD D. VANLANINGHAM
__________
Appeal No. 96-3696
Application No. 08/242,9871
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before ABRAMS, FRANKFORT and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the decision of the examiner
finally rejecting claims 1, 3-7 and 9-17. Claim 8 has been
1Application for patent filed May 16, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007