Appeal No. 96-3696 Application No. 08/242,987 member paralleling a portion of the bone and including a means for centering the planar member “over” the bone. In the Bowman system, the alignment guide comprises a rod 40 “adapted to be inserted into the medullary canal in the tibia bone” (column 2, lines 38 and 39, emphasis added). All of the other elements of the mechanism that aligns planar member 28 are carried by rod 40, including the means for centering it. It is clear that Bowman utilizes an intramedullary guide, rather than the extramedullary guide required by this claim, and the rejection fails at the outset. Moreover, there thus is no “body part adapted for longitudinal connection to said extramedullary guide,” “planar member paralleling a portion of said bone when said extramedullary guide is properly positioned with respect to said bone,” or “means for centering said planar member over said bone when the extramedullary guide is properly positioned with respect to said bone.” Since Bowman fails to disclose all of the required structure, it does not anticipate claim 15 and the rejection of this claim and those which depend from it is not sustained. 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007