Ex parte OLNOWICH et al. - Page 11




          Appeal No. 96-3763                                                          
          Application 07/946,509                                                      



          header generation, it is clear to us that messages sent in                  
          network systems must have, at least, a source and destination               
          and that this information is included in “headers.”  There-                 
          fore, a header must somehow be generated in some manner.                    


                    However, it is still up to the examiner, in the                   
          first instance, to make out a prima facie case of obviousness               
          with regard to the claimed subject matter.  We are skeptical,               
          in the instant case, that the examiner has done so.  While the              
          examiner, at pages 4-5 of the answer, cites various elements                
          being disclosed by the references, it is unclear how these                  
          recited elements correspond to that which is claimed.  Fur-                 
          ther, recognizing the deficiency in Childs with regard to a                 
          hardware based message header generation means, the examiner                
          refers to Filepp for a teaching of generating headers to send               
          over a network through the use of an application program and                
          then refers to Takada for a                                                 


          hardware based message header generator.  Finally, the exam-                
          iner merely concludes that it would have been obvious to                    

                                         11                                           





Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007