THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 41
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WILLIAM R. MURRAY, JR.,
STEWART R. CARL and ARTHUR H. ZARNOWITZ
_____________
Appeal No. 96-4097
Application 08/138,6341
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CALVERT, MEISTER and McQUADE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 56
to 63, all of the claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed October 15, 1993. According to
appellants, this application is a continuation-in-part of application
08/042,851, filed April 5, 1993, which is a continuation of application
07/824,964, filed January 24, 1992, and a continuation-in-part of application
08/006,311, filed January 19, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007