Appeal No. 96-4107
Application No. 08/368,262
Sozuki et al. (Sozuki) 5,273,523 Dec. 28,
1993
Plechinger et al. 5,318,518 Jun. 7,
1994
(Plechinger)
Adolf et al. (Adolf) 5,334,180 Aug. 2,
1994
THE REJECTIONS
Claim 1 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being
anticipated by Harvey, Harrison or Adolf.
Claims 2 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
being anticipated by Barrington or Thomas.
Claims 4 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Harvey in view of Harrison.
Claims 6 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Harvey in view of Harrison and Sozuki.
Claims 7 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Harvey in view of Harrison and
Plechinger.
The rejections are explained in the Examiner's Answer.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007