Ex parte RICH - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-4144                                         Page 2           
          Application No. 08/169,019                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellant's invention relates to a hanging rack for                
          printed circuit panels.  Claim 1 is representative of the subject           
          matter on appeal and a copy of claim 1, as it appears in the                
          appendix to the appellant's brief, is attached to this decision.            


               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Shave et al.             1,248,732                Dec. 4, 1917              
          (Shave)                                                                     
          Husted et al.            4,502,601                Mar. 5, 1985              
          (Husted)                                                                    



               Claims 1 through 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,               
          second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly           
          point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the                 
          appellant regards as the invention.                                         


               Claims 1 through 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)             
          as being anticipated by Husted.                                             


               Claim 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                  
          unpatentable over Husted in view of Shave.                                  








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007