THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte DAVID KELLERMAN
________________
Appeal No. 97-0132
Application 08/157,7091
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before MEISTER, STAAB and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the final rejection of claims 1,
3 through 7 and 10 through 18. The appellant has since canceled
1Application for patent filed November 24, 1993.
According to appellant, this application is a continuation-in-
part of Application 07/957,984, filed October 6, 1992, now
abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Application
07/690,661, filed April 24, 1991, now U.S. Patent No. 5,154,682,
issued October 13, 1992, which is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/407,145, filed September 14, 1989, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007