Appeal No. 97-0145
Application 08/073,327
consideration of the appellants' Brief on Appeal, the examiner
decided that claims 1 through 9 were allowable (Answer, page 5).
This being the case, only claims 11 through 14 remain before us
on appeal.
The appellants' invention, as expressed in claims 11 through
14, is directed to a cartridge housing comprising a base and a
cover having mating projections and pockets. The appealed claims
appear in an appendix to the Brief on Appeal.
THE REFERENCES
The references relied upon by the examiner to support the
final rejection of claims 11 through 14 are:
Bettinger et al. 4,566,653 Jan. 28, 1986
(Bettinger)
The admitted prior art as described on pages 1 through 3 of the
appellants' specification.2
THE REJECTIONS
Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being
clearly anticipated by Bettinger.
2While the examiner has not specified the exact portion of
the specification upon which he relies, we believe these to be
the pages.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007