Appeal No. 97-0145 Application 08/073,327 in the self evident advantage of ease of aligning the base and the cover as they are being joined, which would have been known to the artisan, as well as Bettinger’s explicit teaching that embodiments utilizing both non-angled and angled walls are usable in joining the base and the cover of a tape cartridge (columns 3 and 4). Thus, the teachings of Bettinger establish a prima facie case of obviousness with regard to the subject matter of claim 13. The examiner has rejected claim 14 as being unpatentable over Bettinger in view of the admitted prior art contained in the appellants' specification. Bettinger does not disclose any technique for attaching together the base and the cover of the cartridge, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would have recognized that it is implicit in this reference that such means must be provided, or else the cartridge would be inoperative for the purpose intended. On page 2 of their specification, the appellants' state that it was known at the time of their invention to ultrasonically weld together the two portions of a tape cartridge. It therefore is our opinion that one of ordinary skill in the art would have found it obvious to utilize such a method for attaching together the base and the cover of the Bettinger cartridge. In the course of this it further would have 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007