THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte GORDON S. LINOFF and CRAIG W. STANFILL
_____________
Appeal No. 97-0244
Application 08/042,3571
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have appealed to the board from the examiner's
final rejection of claims 2 thru 6, which constitute all of
the claims remaining in the application.
Representative claim 3 is reproduced below:
Application for patent filed April 2, 1993.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007