THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte WOLFGANG K. VON SCHWARZENFELD ________________ Appeal No. 97-0275 Application 08/373,1921 ________________ ON BRIEF ________________ Before CALVERT, ABRAMS and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges. McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal, filed in response to the final rejection dated November 7, 1995 (Paper No. 9), involves claims 12 through 14 and 23, all of the claims pending in the application.2 1Application for patent filed January 13, 1995. According to appellant, this application is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of PCT/EP94/01274 filed April 23, 1994. 2Claims 12 through 14 were amended and claim 23 was added subsequent to the final rejection. -1-Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007