Appeal No. 97-0275
Application 08/373,192
Birchill-Ljungstrom combination, the appellant’s position (see
pages 6 through 11 in the brief, Paper No. 17) that the combined
teachings of these references would not have suggested the
subject matter recited in claim 23, and in claims 12 through 14
which depend therefrom, is persuasive. Accordingly, we shall not
sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection of these claims.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
IAN A. CALVERT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
NEAL E. ABRAMS ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
JOHN P. McQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
-5-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007