Ex parte DONATI - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 97-0441                                                                                                                     
                 Application No. 08/511,841                                                                                                             


                 remaining in the application.  Claims 1, 3 and 6 through 16                                                                            
                 have been canceled.2                                                                                                                   


                 Appellant’s invention relates to an electrically operated                                                                              
                 toilet tank flush valve system which aids in water                                                                                     
                 conservation. As explained on pages 6-7 of the specification,                                                                          
                 the system includes an adjustable electrical float sensor                                                                              
                 switch unit (700), seen best in Figures 12 and 14 of the                                                                               
                 drawings, operationally connected to a solenoid valve (200)                                                                            
                 for allowing filling of the toilet tank (50) to a                                                                                      
                 predetermined maximum level as desired or as required by local                                                                         
                 code.  Independent claim 17 is representative of the subject                                                                           
                 matter on appeal and a copy of that claim appears in the                                                                               
                 Appendix to appellant’s brief.                                                                                                         






                          2Claims 2 and 5 were amended subsequent to the final                                                                          
                 rejection (see Paper Nos. 14 and 23).  According to the                                                                                
                 examiner (Paper No. 15), the rejection of claims 2, 4 and 5                                                                            
                 under                                                                                                                                  
                 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, found on pages 3-4 of the                                                                           
                 final rejection has been overcome.                                                                                                     

                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007