Appeal No. 97-0744 Page 3
Application No. 08/270,851
BACKGROUND
The appellants' invention relates to a mount for a
camera-PC terminal. An understanding of the invention can be
derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which appears in
the appendix to the examiner's answer.
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Guddee 5,052,651 Oct. 1,
1991
Tani 5,318,257 June
7, 1994
Claims 1 to 7, 9 to 17 and 19 to 23 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Guddee in view of
Tani.
Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced
by the examiner and the appellants regarding the above-noted
rejection, we make reference to the examiner's answer (Paper
No. 14, mailed September 30, 1996) for the examiner's complete
reasoning in support of the rejection, and to the appellants'
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007