THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DANIEL H. VELLER
____________
Appeal No. 97-0754
Application No. 08/408,4781
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 2 and 12 through 15. Claims 3 through 5
have been canceled and claims 6 through 11 have been withdrawn
from consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as being drawn to a
nonelected invention.
We REVERSE and enter a new rejection pursuant to 37 CFR
1Application for patent filed March 22, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007