Appeal No. 97-0754 Page 3 Application No. 08/408,478 BACKGROUND The appellant's invention relates to a separable golf club shaft. Claim 1 is representative of the subject matter on appeal and a copy of claim 1, as it appears in the appendix to the appellant's brief, is attached to this decision. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Steffes 3,334,901 Aug. 8, 1967 Pelz 5,039,098 Aug. 13, 1991 References made of record by this panel of the Board are: Murphy 4,253,666 March 3, 1981 Dopkowski 4,340,227 July 20, 1982 Palmer et al. (Palmer) 4,664,382 May 12, 1987 Claims 1, 2, 12 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Pelz. Claims 14 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Pelz in view of Steffes. Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-notedPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007