Ex parte HAMAEKERS - Page 3




          Appeal No. 97-0766                                         Page 3           
          Application No. 08/287,448                                                  


                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The appellant's invention relates to an annular vibration              
          damping machine element.  An understanding of the invention                 
          can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 13 and 18,                
          which appear in the appendix to the appellant's brief.                      


               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Dillman                  2,723,573                     Nov. 15,             
          1955                                                                        
          Withers                  5,299,468                     April 5,             
          1994                                                                        
          Gebhardt                 2,162,611                     Feb.  5,             
          1986                                                                        
                              (United Kingdom)                                        



               Claims 13 through 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                  
          102(b) as being anticipated by Gebhardt.                                    


               Claim 16 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                
          unpatentable over Gebhardt in view of Dillman.                              










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007