THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARK RAPPAPORT
____________
Appeal No. 97-0767
Application No. 08/383,9961
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MEISTER, ABRAMS, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MEISTER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Mark Rappaport (the appellant) appeals from claims 1-3 and
8-10. Claims 4-7, the only other claims present in the
application, have been indicated as being allowable subject to
the requirement that they be rewritten to include all the subject
matter of the claims from which they depend. We affirm.
1Application for patent filed February 6, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007